Archive for September, 2007

h1

New Supreme Court Term

September 26, 2007

The Supreme Court will begin its new term on October 1, and employers should pay close attention to the docket.  This year, the Court will hear several employment law cases, and in particular several ADEA matters. 

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 protects workers age 40 and over from employment-related discrimination.  As your workforce ages and new generations start working (and supervising), make sure you understand at least the basics of the ADEA.  A great place to start is the Age Discrimination part of the EEOC website at http://www.eeoc.gov/types/age.html.

h1

Drug-Free Workplace Advisor from the Department of Labor

September 19, 2007

Ronald Reagan has been quoted as saying: “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’”

The truth is that both the state and federal governments offer a wealth of free information, education, and tools for businesses of all sizes.

Last week we wrote about the Department of Labor’s Working Partners program to help businesses fight drug and alcohol abuse and the associated costs in their workplace.  The Working Partners website offers help to businesses of all sizes and in various stages of dealing with workplace substance abuse.

If you are in the early stages of developing a strategy to fight workplace substance abuse issues (or haven’t started yet), the Working Partners site has an area just for you.  The Drug-Free Workplace Advisor is an interactive tool that helps businesses build tailored drug-free workplace policies and programs and provides information about coverage and requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988.  The Program Builder offers tools to help business owners focus on Policy Development, Supervisor Training, Employee Education, Employee Assistance Programs, and Drug Testing Programs.   

h1

Working Partners – a worthwhile website

September 12, 2007

Not only is September National Preparedness Month, it’s also National Drug and Alcohol Addiction Recovery Month

While this observance isn’t limited to just worplace drug and alcohol issues, it’s no secret that alcohol and drug addiction costs employers millions of dollars in healthcare costs, production slow down, and other effects.  In recognition of this, the US Department of Labor has created the Working Partners for an Alcohol and Drug-Free Workplace Program.   

Visit the Working Partners website for free training and educuational materials to help you, your employees, and your business rise above the costs of addiction.

h1

Avoid Phrases That Can Sabotage Job-Review Meetings

September 5, 2007

A great article from HR Specialist:

When you talk with employees about their performance reviews, beware of using common phrases that can unintentionally communicate the wrong message, or come across as too negative or personal.

Certain phrases can kill employee morale, weaken productivity or open up the organization to a discrimination lawsuit.

Your goal is to deliver reviews that help shape employees’ performance without becoming sidetracked by anger, emotion or fear of conflict. To do so, avoid the following phrases:

“You’re wrong.” If an employee tries to explain why her job rating should have been higher, don’t slap back with a Trump-like, “You’re wrong.” That will only trigger anger and more confrontation. Instead, turn back to your documented facts of the employee’s performance and say, “I know you disagree, but I believe this evaluation accurately reflects your performance.”

“What was your problem?” Don’t use the question as a way to ask why an employee had difficulty completing a project or task. Employees will bristle at such a statement. Instead say, “What were the conditions from your perspective that made it difficult for you to complete the task?”

“You really did a great job but … ” Whatever comes after the “but” negates the preceding compliment. Don’t directly connect praise with constructive criticism. Instead say, “On the other hand, you can do even better by making these improvements.” Then, cite them specifically.

“I understand.” This phrase can excuse unacceptable performance or behavior by conveying empathy. Avoid it when possible.

“Your position here is solid as long as you keep up the good work.” You may intend such statements to encourage good performance, but they’re legally dangerous because they imply an employment contract that a court could find binding. That limits the organization’s ability to ever fire the person.